The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #112
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| TES FY24--SEE NOTE A | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2023 | $991.0M |
| GUIDANCE TES FY22 EO14042 | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2021 | $679.0M |
| GUIDANCE OMNIBUS | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2018 | $413.4M |
| MK6 GEUS FY21 | Department of Defense | Feb 26, 2021 | $396.7M |
| MK6 GEUS FY19 | Department of Defense | Feb 15, 2019 | $391.8M |
| FIGF::OT::IGF CLIN 1, 7 AND 15 TES (FY16) | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2015 | $379.9M |
| IGF::CT::IGF TRIDENT MK 6 GUIDANCE SYSTEM PEUS | Department of Defense | Feb 1, 2017 | $367.8M |
| MOD 1 G S OTHER SPALT MATERIAL | Department of Defense | Mar 8, 2013 | $299.6M |
| MK6 GUIDANCE GEUS FY23 | Department of Defense | Aug 30, 2023 | $295.2M |
| MOD1 GS OTHER SPALT MATERIAL | Department of Defense | Mar 1, 2014 | $284.1M |
| MK6 GUIDANCE SYSTEM REPAIREQUIVALENTUNIT | Department of Defense | Jan 24, 2012 | $238.5M |
| IGF::CT::IGF TRIDENT MK 6 GUIDANCE SYSTEM PEUS | Department of Defense | Feb 2, 2016 | $164.6M |
| ANALYTICAL ENGINEERING FOR GMG LABOR "IGF::OT::IGF" | Department of Defense | Aug 30, 2017 | $61.8M |
| TRIDENT LE2 ADVANCED DEVELOPMENT (FY20) (R&D) | Department of Defense | Oct 1, 2019 | $60.7M |
| COMMERCIAL LUNAR PAYLOAD SERVICES (CLPS)TASK ORDER CP-12 CLPS PAYLOADS AND RESEARCH INVESTIGATIONS ON THE SURFACE OF THE MOON | National Aeronautics and Space Administration | Jul 21, 2022 | $56.9M |
| ADVANCE THE DEVELOPMENT OF A MEDICAL COUNTERMEASURE (MCM) EVALUATION PLATFORM THAT CONSISTS OF VASCULAR-IMMUNE AND SMALL INTESTINE-IMMUNE ORGAN-ON-CHIP MODELS, MOLECULAR ASSAYS, OMICS-BASED TECHNOLOGIES, ADVANCED ANALYTICAL METHODS FOR BIOMARKER DISC | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 29, 2023 | $36.0M |
| GLOBAL POSITIONING SYSTEM TEST ASSET PROGRAM (GTAP) | Department of Defense | Feb 1, 2021 | $29.8M |
| ACNS | Department of Defense | Sep 26, 2023 | $18.4M |
| IGF::OT::IGF | Department of Defense | Dec 31, 2016 | $16.0M |
| DEVELOPMENT OF AUTONOMY SOFTWARE FOR THE LARGE DISPLACEMENT UNDERSEA UNMANNED VEHICLE AUTONOMOUS CONTROLLER AND DIGITAL SIMULATION. | Department of Defense | Sep 1, 2020 | $12.4M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. has received $812,467,552 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. works with 3 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Department of Health and Human Services. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
The Charles Stark Draper Laboratory, Inc. is ranked #112 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.