Tru Simulation + Training Inc.
Federal Contractor · Rank #1381
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| OFT-1 & BDS | Department of Defense | Feb 29, 2024 | $96.8M |
| CESSNA 186/206 PILOT TRAINING | Department of Justice | Jan 3, 2024 | $147K |
| PILATUS PC-12 NGX PILOT TRAINING | Department of Justice | Sep 19, 2024 | $77K |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Tru Simulation + Training Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ
Tru Simulation + Training Inc. has received $55,033,153 in total federal obligations across 3 awards and 3 contracts.
Tru Simulation + Training Inc. works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Justice. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Tru Simulation + Training Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.
Tru Simulation + Training Inc. is ranked #1381 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.