University of Washington
Federal Contractor · Rank #689
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| FY23 STAFAC AMFIP PRODUCTION | Department of Defense | Sep 8, 2023 | $55.5M |
| NHLBI DNA RESEQUENCING AND GENOTYPING SERVICE: LABORATORY CENTER | Department of Health and Human Services | Jun 1, 2011 | $29.5M |
| ROBOTIC AUTONOMY IN COMPLEX ENVIRONMENTS WITH RESILIENCY (RACER) PHASE II | Department of Defense | Sep 29, 2023 | $25.3M |
| IGF::OT::IGF - MULTI-ETHNIC STUDY OF ATHEROSCLEROSIS (MESA)III- COORDINATING CENTER | Department of Health and Human Services | Aug 14, 2015 | $19.8M |
| THE PURPOSE OF THE CONTRACT IS TO ENSURE STANDARDIZATION AND COMPARABILITY OF FUNCTIONAL GENOMICS SERVICES AND ASSAYS CONDUCTED FOR THE NIAID SIMIAN VACCINE EVALUATION UNITS AND DAIDS-SUPPORTED PRECLINICAL NONHUMAN PRIMATE(NHP) STUDIES. THE ULTIMATE | Department of Health and Human Services | Jul 1, 2018 | $17.3M |
| FY23 STAFAC AMFIP DEVELOPMENT | Department of Defense | Dec 16, 2022 | $16.9M |
| TASK AREA A CORE STUDY OPERATIONS.TASK AREA A SHALL ENCOMPASS ANNUAL FOLLOW-UP OF COHORT MEMBERS, CLINICAL ENDPOINTS ASCERTAINMENT, STUDY COORDINATION ACTIVITIES, MAINTENANCE OF THE DATABASE AND BIOSPECIMEN REPOSITORY, AND DATA ANALYSIS AND MANUSCRIP | Department of Health and Human Services | Dec 19, 2019 | $13.6M |
| BASE AWARD: NIMHD US BURDEN OF HEALTH DISPARITIES PROVIDING EPIDEMIOLOGICAL RESEARCH SUPPORT ON HOW DISEASES, INJURIES AND RISK FACTORS ARE DISTRIBUTED IN THE US BIOSTATISTICAL CONSULTATION COMPUTATIONAL APPROACHES AND PUBLIC PLATFORM THAT ALLOWS F | Department of Health and Human Services | Mar 25, 2023 | $13.2M |
| CENTRALIZED OMICS RESOURCE (CORE) YEAR 5 | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 25, 2020 | $12.8M |
| TRANS-OMICS FOR PRECISION MEDICINE (TOPMED) DATA COORDINATING CENTER (DCC) | Department of Health and Human Services | Apr 26, 2018 | $11.2M |
| FY25 RDT&E ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Sep 17, 2024 | $10.0M |
| BACKBONE COMPONENTS OF AN ARCTIC MOBILE OBSERVING SYSTEM: SEAGLIDERS, FLOATS, SA (SITUATIONAL AWARENESS) AND C2 (COMMAND AND CONTROL) | Department of Defense | Sep 20, 2019 | $9.9M |
| CROSS DOMAIN AUTONOMY | Department of Defense | May 11, 2022 | $8.4M |
| CENTRALIZED OMICS RESOURCE (CORE)YEAR 4 | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 27, 2019 | $8.0M |
| IGF::OT::IGF MHK ADVANCEMENT FOR NAVAL FACILITIES | Department of Defense | Mar 31, 2014 | $8.0M |
| FY24 RDT&E ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Sep 7, 2023 | $7.7M |
| IGF::OT::IGF CCTN- MALE SITES - CONTRACEPTIVE EFFICACY CLINICAL TRIAL HHSN275201300025I/HHSN27500006 | Department of Health and Human Services | Sep 14, 2015 | $7.7M |
| MIBS - MARINE IMAGING AND BEACON SYSTEM | Department of Defense | May 10, 2021 | $7.6M |
| FY24 OM&N ACOUSTIC SYSTEMS | Department of Defense | Mar 21, 2024 | $7.5M |
| RESIDENT SEABED AUTONOMY | Department of Defense | Apr 29, 2020 | $7.0M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
University of Washington Federal Contracts FAQ
University of Washington has received $114,212,153 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.
University of Washington works with 2 federal agencies, including Department of Defense, Department of Health and Human Services. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
University of Washington has received federal awards in multiple states.
University of Washington is ranked #689 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
The methodology behind every numeric value on this page is publicly documented on the USASpending.gov federal awards data portal and described in detail on this site’s methodology page. Refresh cadence varies by underlying series; the page surfaces the as-of date for each number so readers can trace any figure back to the source release.
For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.