Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc.

Federal Contractor · Rank #1820

Total Federal Spending
$41.0M
$40,972,014
Total Obligations
3
Total Awards
3
Contracts
1
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
COAL ORE FOR POWER PLANTDepartment of DefenseOct 1, 2023$22.1M
SUB-BITUMINOUS COAL BASE PERIOD FY24Department of DefenseOct 23, 2023$18.9M
COAL PURCHASES FY23Department of DefenseOct 28, 2022$17.3M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. Federal Contracts FAQ

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. has received $40,972,014 in total federal obligations across 3 awards and 3 contracts.

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. has received federal awards in multiple states.

Usibelli Coal Mine, Inc. is ranked #1820 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

For this entity, the underlying data on this page comes from USASpending.gov federal awards data. The breakdown above is the federal record; the paragraphs below add the per-entity context that makes the headline numbers usable for a real decision rather than just a data lookup.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

For readers using this page as a decision input, the related-entity pages elsewhere on the site provide the comparison set. The most useful comparison for this entity is typically a peer within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards with similar size, similar exposure, or similar geography — not the national-level summary alone.