Webcor Construction Lp
Federal Contractor · Rank #1301
Spending by Agency
Recent Awards
| Description | Agency | Start Date | Amount |
|---|---|---|---|
| DESIGN BUILD MCON PROJECT P1911 - RANGE CONTROL COMPLEX, NAWS CHINA LAKE, CALIFORNIA | Department of Defense | Jun 24, 2021 | $179.0M |
| LRP PROJECTS, NAWS CHINA LAKE, CA | Department of Defense | Sep 15, 2021 | $29.4M |
All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.
Webcor Construction Lp Federal Contracts FAQ
Webcor Construction Lp has received $58,559,678 in total federal obligations across 2 awards and 2 contracts.
Webcor Construction Lp works with 1 federal agencies, including Department of Defense. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.
Webcor Construction Lp has received federal awards in multiple states.
Webcor Construction Lp is ranked #1301 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.
Explore Other Federal Contractors
Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.
this entity is one of the data points covered by this site’s U.S. federal government spending dataset. The detail above comes directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data; the context that follows situates the headline numbers against the broader distribution across U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards.
Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.
Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.