Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Xator LLC

Federal Contractor · Rank #83

Total Federal Spending
$1.1B
$1,132,434,863
Total Obligations
25
Total Awards
25
Contracts
3
Agencies

Spending by Agency

Recent Awards

DescriptionAgencyStart DateAmount
CARE LOGISTICAL SUPPORT SERVICES - CLSSDepartment of StateMar 1, 2023$2.3B
OVERSEAS SECURITY INSTALLATION SERVICESDepartment of StateDec 3, 2019$536.0M
INTEGRATED BASE DEFENSE SECURITY SYSTEM (IBDSS) NEXT - EASTERN REGIONDepartment of DefenseJan 6, 2023$42.8M
FIXED SITE SUSTAINMENT III FOR CONTRACTOR LOGISTIC SUPPORT IN THE CONTINENTAL UNITED STATESDepartment of DefenseFeb 26, 2020$38.9M
MAINTAIN CONTINUOUS IN-THEATER OPERATIONAL READINESS OF THE CONTAINERIZED ANTI-UAV DEFENSE SYSTEMS (C-AUDS) FOR PACAFDepartment of DefenseDec 30, 2020$8.9M
QATAR F-15QA PERMANENT FACILITIES INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM INSTALLATION, SECURE STORAGE INVENTORY MANAGERS AND CONTRACTOR LOGISTICS SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseMar 2, 2022$8.3M
AWARD BGCAPP RFPDepartment of DefenseJul 15, 2020$7.4M
INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM (IDS) INSTALLATION OF EQUIPMENT, MATERIALS, AND INITIAL SPARES.Department of DefenseSep 15, 2023$7.3M
INTEGRATED BASE DETECTION SYSTEM DESIGN INSTALL/UPDATEFAIRCHILD, HILL, MALMSTROM AFBDepartment of DefenseJun 20, 2023$7.0M
M&S WIESBADENDepartment of DefenseSep 15, 2022$6.5M
THE PURPOSE OF THIS ACTION IS TO AWARD A NEW FIRM FIXED PRICE TASK ORDER FOR CONTRACTOR TO PROVIDE M&S OF ESS U.S. ARMY GARRISONS RHINELAND-PFALZ AND BAUMHOLDER, GERMANY MIHAIL KOGALNICEANU AIR BASE, ROMANIA NOVO SELO TRAINING AREA, BULGARIADepartment of DefenseSep 2, 2022$5.6M
BENELUX M&SDepartment of DefenseSep 12, 2022$5.1M
KADENA AIR FORCE BASE INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM UPGRADEDepartment of DefenseApr 7, 2020$5.0M
IGF::OT::IGF LANGLEY AFB SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADEDepartment of DefenseOct 18, 2018$5.0M
ADVANCING HAZARD PREDICTION AND ASSESSMENT CAPABILITY (HPAC) TO IMPROVE CHEMICAL AND BIOLOGICAL HAZARD PREDICTION CAPABILITIESDepartment of DefenseApr 15, 2020$4.7M
IGF::OT::IGF FMS SAUDI ARABIA CASE SR-D-SAP CRITICALLY CONTROLLED ASSETS INTRUSION DETECTION SYSTEM PROJECTDepartment of DefenseApr 15, 2016$4.6M
BARKSDALE AFB SECURITY SYSTEM UPGRADE AND REPLACEMENT PROJECTDepartment of DefenseFeb 27, 2020$4.0M
IGF::OT::IGF DOVER AFB&MINOT AFB BURIED LINE SENSOR REPAIR AND INTERIM CONTRACTOR SUPPORTDepartment of DefenseApr 13, 2017$3.9M
PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION OF ELECTRONIC SECURITY SYSTEMS AT NAVAL RESEARCH LAB, CAMP ROBERTS, CA.Department of DefenseSep 17, 2021$3.7M
DULUTH ANGB SECUTIY SYSTEM UPGRADEDepartment of DefenseJul 10, 2019$3.7M

All federal spending data sourced from USAspending.gov, the official source for federal award data as mandated by the Government Accountability Office.

Xator LLC Federal Contracts FAQ

Xator LLC has received $1,132,434,863 in total federal obligations across 25 awards and 25 contracts.

Xator LLC works with 3 federal agencies, including Department of State, Department of Defense, Department of the Interior. The largest agency relationships are based on total dollar obligations.

Xator LLC has received federal awards in multiple states.

Xator LLC is ranked #83 among the largest federal contractors by total obligation amount. Rankings are based on USASpending.gov data for FY2024.

Sources: USASpending.gov, Federal Procurement Data System
Last updated:

Spending figures represent total federal obligations for FY2024, as reported through USASpending.gov. Rankings are based on aggregate obligation amounts across all contract, grant, and direct payment awards.

The this entity record above pulls directly from USASpending.gov federal awards data. What follows is the per-entity context — how this entity sits in the broader U.S. federal government spending distribution and which underlying factors drive the headline numbers.

Every number on this page links back to USASpending.gov federal awards data; the methodology page describes the inputs, refresh cadence, and known limitations of the underlying data product.

Practical use of this page is in combination with the comparison and ranking pages elsewhere on the site, which surface the same data for this entity’s peers within U.S. federal contracts, grants, and awards. A single-entity reading without peer context can be misleading when an entity is an outlier on one axis but typical on another.