Skip to main content
TaxDollarData

Cost-Plus Contract

A contract where the government reimburses the contractor for allowable costs plus a fee (profit), used for complex projects where total costs are hard to predict upfront.

How It Works

Cost-plus (or "cost-reimbursement") contracts are authorized under FAR Subpart 16.3 and used when requirements are too uncertain to price on a fixed-price basis, typically complex R&D, weapons development, or first-of-kind engineering. The contractor is reimbursed for actual "allowable" costs incurred (as defined by FAR Part 31 cost principles) plus an agreed-upon fee that represents profit. Three major variants exist: (1) Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF), where the fee is set at award and does not vary with actual cost; (2) Cost-Plus-Incentive-Fee (CPIF), where the fee scales up or down from a target based on a cost-sharing formula if final cost comes in under or over the target; and (3) Cost-Plus-Award-Fee (CPAF), where a portion of the fee is determined subjectively by the government based on periodic performance evaluations. Cost-plus contracts shift financial risk to the government, the contractor is paid for its actual costs even if the program runs over budget, which critics argue weakens cost-control incentives. The FAR explicitly prohibits Cost-Plus-Percentage-of-Cost (CPPC) contracts because they create perverse incentives (the contractor's fee grows with its costs). To mitigate weak incentives, the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA) audits cost-reimbursement contractors' incurred costs, overhead rates, and indirect cost submissions, routinely questioning $5-10 billion per year in claimed costs. Major programs on cost-plus vehicles include the F-35 engineering and manufacturing development phase, the Columbia-class submarine design, the NGAD sixth-generation fighter, and most NASA human spaceflight contracts including Artemis Gateway. Cost-plus contractors must maintain approved accounting systems under DFARS 252.242-7006 and are subject to Cost Accounting Standards (CAS) at FAR Part 30 for contracts above $2 million. The DoD is under longstanding congressional pressure (NDAA provisions in FY2015, FY2018, and subsequent years) to shift more programs from cost-plus to fixed-price whenever feasible, though early-phase R&D remains predominantly cost-reimbursement.

Related Terms

  • Firm-Fixed-Price Contract (FFP), A contract with a set price that doesn't change regardless of the contractor's actual costs, placing the financial risk on the contractor, not the government.
  • Federal Contract, A legally binding agreement between the U.S. government and a private company to provide goods or services, from fighter jets to IT consulting.
  • Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), The comprehensive rule book governing how federal agencies buy goods and services, covering everything from how to write a solicitation to when to use competitive bidding.

About This Definition

This definition is part of the TaxDollarData Federal Spending Glossary, 46 terms explaining how the U.S. government spends taxpayer money. All definitions are written in plain language for taxpayers, journalists, contractors, and researchers.

this entity is one of the U.S. federal government spending concepts that recurs across this site. The definition above is the technical answer; the paragraphs below add the practical context for how the concept connects to the USASpending.gov federal awards data data behind every per-entity page on the site.

In the USASpending.gov federal awards data data, this concept shapes one or more of the fields that drive the per-entity grades and rankings on this site. The methodology page describes which fields feed into which output; this glossary entry documents the underlying term.

Source: USAspending.gov, 2026.